After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 448267 - RFE: add a way to change the default time format of desktop apps
RFE: add a way to change the default time format of desktop apps
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 333104
Product: gnome-control-center
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.19.x
Other All
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Control-Center Maintainers
Control-Center Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-06-16 17:38 UTC by Nicolas Mailhot
Modified: 2007-10-06 09:21 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.19/2.20



Description Nicolas Mailhot 2007-06-16 17:38:46 UTC
Please describe the problem:
Current desktop apps format their time according to the libc locale or private settings.

Unfortunately:
1. having apps use inconsistent time formats is confusing to the user
2. the user may have different habits than what the locale specifies (for example for expatriates or in an international entity that mandates a particular time format internally)
3. the libc coverage is limited and libc maintainers will refuse to add minority date formatting usages as alternative locales (you can set LC_TIME to another country, but that will translate day names in addition to changing the formatting)

In particular getting one's desktop to use the nice new standard and sane iso-8601 time presentation is hell

Please add a way to change one's desktop time format settings (it's trivial in other OSes)

Steps to reproduce:


Actual results:


Expected results:


Does this happen every time?


Other information:
Comment 1 Jens Granseuer 2007-10-06 09:21:56 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 333104 ***