After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 447755 - crash in Rhythmbox Music Player:
crash in Rhythmbox Music Player:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 409540
Product: rhythmbox
Classification: Other
Component: general
0.10.0
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: RhythmBox Maintainers
RhythmBox Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-06-15 03:52 UTC by ychikui@net.ie.niigata-u.ac.jp
Modified: 2007-06-15 08:52 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description ychikui@net.ie.niigata-u.ac.jp 2007-06-15 03:52:55 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.2 2007-05-28 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:47:07 EDT 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: panther-gtk2
Icon Theme: ychikui_orig

Memory status: size: 657788928 vsize: 657788928 resident: 63262720 share: 38162432 rss: 63262720 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1181879355 rtime: 191 utime: 170 stime: 21 cutime:7 cstime: 1 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/rhythmbox'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 46912512094320 (LWP 3637)]
[New Thread 1115699536 (LWP 3644)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x000000332560d89f in waitpid () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

Thread 1 (Thread 46912512094320 (LWP 3637))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 raise
    from /lib64/libc.so.6
  • #4 abort
    from /lib64/libc.so.6
  • #5 g_logv
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 g_log
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 g_assert_warning
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 rb_shell_preferences_new
  • #9 ??
  • #10 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #11 ??
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #13 g_signal_emit
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 ??
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 g_signal_emit
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 gtk_widget_activate
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #20 gtk_menu_shell_activate_item
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #24 ??
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #25 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #26 g_signal_emit
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #27 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #28 gtk_propagate_event
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #29 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #30 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #31 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #32 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #33 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #34 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #35 main
  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

Comment 1 Jonathan Matthew 2007-06-15 08:52:06 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 409540 ***