After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 446868 - crash in File Browser: Nautilus scp between FC6...
crash in File Browser: Nautilus scp between FC6...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 461765
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.18.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
: 447775 448140 454836 456657 456709 462091 462726 463675 464008 489214 489248 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-06-12 20:20 UTC by lbrena
Modified: 2007-10-23 13:46 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description lbrena 2007-06-12 20:20:08 UTC
Version: 2.18.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Nautilus scp between FC6 and F7


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.2 2007-05-28 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:47:07 EDT 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 546082816 vsize: 546082816 resident: 96772096 share: 29958144 rss: 96772096 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1181670789 rtime: 5655 utime: 3182 stime: 2473 cutime:21 cstime: 7 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 46912496373456 (LWP 5044)]
[New Thread 1115699536 (LWP 8996)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00000032ce6c7956 in poll () from /lib64/libc.so.6

Thread 2 (Thread 1115699536 (LWP 8996))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #4 gnome_vfs_get_file_info_from_handle_cancellable
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #5 gnome_vfs_get_file_info_from_handle
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #6 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #7 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #8 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #9 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #10 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #11 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #12 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #13 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #14 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #15 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #16 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #17 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #18 start_thread
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #19 clone
    from /lib64/libc.so.6


----------- .xsession-errors (6 sec old) ---------------------
--- Hash table keys for warning below:
--> file:///home/lbrenta
(nautilus:8907): Eel-WARNING **: "nautilus-metafile.c: metafiles" hash table still has 1 element at quit time (keys above)
--- Hash table keys for warning below:
--> file:///home/lbrenta
(nautilus:8907): Eel-WARNING **: "nautilus-directory.c: directories" hash table still has 1 element at quit time (keys above)
reloadBuffers(): 52 nodes checked in 2.92E-4 second(s)
reloadBuffers(): 52 nodes checked in 3.93E-4 second(s)
** Message: Hit unexpected error "Operación no permitida" while doing a file operation.
** Message: Hit unexpected error "Operación no permitida" while doing a file operation.
Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0x224def)!
Xlib: sequence lost (0x2300ed > 0x224fb8) in reply type 0xe3!
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-06-13 01:27:54 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so and reopen this bug or report a new one. Thanks in advance!
Comment 2 André Klapper 2007-06-23 11:27:53 UTC
*** Bug 447775 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 André Klapper 2007-06-23 11:27:59 UTC
*** Bug 448140 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 André Klapper 2007-06-23 11:28:09 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, the stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash.

Could you please help fixing this by installing some debugging packages [1], start the application as normal, and try to reproduce the crash, if possible?

Once bug-buddy pops up, you can find the stacktrace in the 'Details', now containing way more information. Please copy that stacktrace and paste it as a comment here. Thanks in advance!

[1] Please install the following debug packages provided by Fedora: nautilus-debuginfo, glib2-debuginfo, gtk2-debuginfo, pango-debuginfo, gnome-vfs2-debuginfo, libgnome-debuginfo, and libgnomeui-debuginfo.

More details can be found here: http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces
Comment 5 André Klapper 2007-07-25 09:33:28 UTC
*** Bug 454836 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 André Klapper 2007-07-25 09:33:35 UTC
*** Bug 456657 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 André Klapper 2007-07-25 09:33:39 UTC
*** Bug 456709 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Iestyn Pryce 2007-08-02 17:03:19 UTC
*** Bug 462726 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 Susana 2007-08-06 14:45:21 UTC
*** Bug 462091 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 10 Susana 2007-08-06 17:49:35 UTC
*** Bug 463675 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 11 Susana 2007-08-06 17:49:42 UTC
*** Bug 464008 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 12 André Klapper 2007-09-11 13:51:51 UTC
same issue as bug 461765

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 461765 ***
Comment 13 Cosimo Cecchi 2007-10-23 13:45:27 UTC
*** Bug 489248 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 14 Cosimo Cecchi 2007-10-23 13:46:30 UTC
*** Bug 489214 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***