After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 446024 - crash in Main Menu:
crash in Main Menu:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 430074
Product: alacarte
Classification: Applications
Component: general
0.11.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Alacarte Maintainer(s)
Alacarte Maintainer(s)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-06-10 13:13 UTC by Robert_Shamburger
Modified: 2007-06-10 16:41 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description Robert_Shamburger 2007-06-10 13:13:57 UTC
Version: 0.11.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.2 2007-05-28 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 47693824 vsize: 47693824 resident: 28786688 share: 19632128 rss: 28786688 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1181481095 rtime: 146 utime: 133 stime: 13 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/alacarte'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208518976 (LWP 11790)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00566402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208518976 (LWP 11790))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 gmenu_tree_ref
    from /usr/lib/libgnome-menu.so.2
  • #5 gmenu_tree_directory_get_tree
    from /usr/lib/libgnome-menu.so.2
  • #6 ??
    from /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gmenu.so
  • #7 PyObject_GetAttr
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #8 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #9 PyEval_EvalCodeEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #10 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #11 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #12 PyEval_EvalCodeEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #14 PyObject_Call
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #15 ??
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #16 PyObject_Call
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #17 PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #18 PyObject_CallObject
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #19 ??
    from /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gobject/_gobject.so
  • #20 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #23 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #24 gtk_widget_activate
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 gtk_menu_shell_activate_item
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #28 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #29 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #30 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #31 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #32 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #33 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #34 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #35 gtk_propagate_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #36 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #37 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #38 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #39 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #40 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #41 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #42 ??
    from /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/_gtk.so
  • #43 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #44 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #45 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #46 PyEval_EvalCodeEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #47 PyEval_EvalCode
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #48 ??
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #49 PyRun_FileExFlags
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #50 PyRun_SimpleFileExFlags
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #51 PyRun_AnyFileExFlags
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #52 Py_Main
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #53 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (10 sec old) ---------------------
    file_path = os.path.join(util.getUserDirectoryPath(), os.path.split(item.get_desktop_file_path())[1])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/posixpath.py", line 77, in split
    i = p.rfind('/') + 1
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'rfind'
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Alacarte/MainWindow.py", line 417, in on_item_tree_show_toggled
    self.editor.setVisible(item, False)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Alacarte/MenuEditor.py", line 205, in setVisible
    self.__addUndo([self.__getMenu(item), item])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Alacarte/MenuEditor.py", line 404, in __addUndo
    file_path = os.path.join(util.getUserDirectoryPath(), os.path.split(item.get_desktop_file_path())[1])
  File "/usr/lib/python2.5/posixpath.py", line 77, in split
    i = p.rfind('/') + 1
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'rfind'
"/usr/bin/alacarte": not in executable format: File format not recognized
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Susana 2007-06-10 16:41:27 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 430074 ***