GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 445429
crash in Home Folder: flasch
Last modified: 2007-08-22 19:43:20 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed? flasch Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: Enforcing Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 88260608 vsize: 88260608 resident: 33308672 share: 18563072 rss: 33308672 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1181292515 rtime: 716 utime: 650 stime: 66 cutime:0 cstime: 1 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208178976 (LWP 3820)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x0043d402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 139317
Thread 1 (Thread -1208178976 (LWP 3820))
----------- .xsession-errors (186 sec old) --------------------- WARNING: Please enter a valid installation path. Please enter the installation path of the Mozilla, SeaMonkey, or Firefox browser (i.e., /usr/lib/mozilla): dir= /root/Bureaublad/install_flash_player_9_linux/ WARNING: Please enter a valid installation path. Please enter the installation path of the Mozilla, SeaMonkey, or Firefox browser (i.e., /usr/lib/mozilla): dir= /root/Bureaublad/install_flash_player_9_linux/ WARNING: Please enter a valid installation path. Please enter the installation path of the Mozilla, SeaMonkey, or Firefox browser (i.e., /usr/lib/mozilla): ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This bug report isn't very useful because it doesn't describe the bug well. If you have time and can still reproduce the bug, please read http://bugzilla.gnome.org/bug-HOWTO.html and add a more useful description to this bug. Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so and reopen this bug or report a new one. Thanks in advance!
*** Bug 454569 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
As mentioned in 454569: I scrolled to "gnome-terminal" in the "Run" (Alt+F2) history, and accidentially hit # then RETURN, which executed "#gnome-terminal". Nautilus started with an empty window and immediately crashed. This is 100% reproducable. Attaches is a trace with gtk2, glib2, gnome-vfs2 and nautilus -debuginfo RPMs installed. Let me know if you need more.
Created attachment 91386 [details] crash trace with debug symbols attached
*** Bug 457201 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 457202 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459398 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459404 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459406 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459408 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459409 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459410 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459412 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459434 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Phil's backtrace is matched to bug 363856 but I'm not sure it's the same bug.
*** Bug 459414 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459415 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459419 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459420 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459421 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459422 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459424 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459425 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459426 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459427 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459433 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459435 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459438 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459453 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459774 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** Bug 459778 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
we still need a better stacktrace
*** Bug 457727 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Andre: the trace from comment #4 isn't sufficient?
Tell me how to make a better backtrace than the one I attached (see comments #3/4) and I will.
*** Bug 466982 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
from comment 4 of this report:
+ Trace 157194
this is *exactly* the same trace as bug 436071, but i am not sure whether bug 436071 is a duplicate of bug 324365 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 436071 ***