GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 439815
crash in Tasks: Nada
Last modified: 2007-05-20 03:24:35 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed? Nada Distribution: Fedora release 6.93 (Rawhide) Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3149.fc7 #1 SMP Fri May 11 12:12:11 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 112340992 vsize: 112340992 resident: 22269952 share: 16224256 rss: 22269952 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1179622852 rtime: 119 utime: 106 stime: 13 cutime:1 cstime: 4 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1209035040 (LWP 28672)] [New Thread -1235301488 (LWP 28692)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x00592402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 135102
Thread 1 (Thread -1209035040 (LWP 28672))
----------- .xsession-errors (104006 sec old) --------------------- (gnome-background-properties:1486): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_width: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (gnome-background-properties:1486): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_height: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (gnome-background-properties:1486): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-background-properties:1486): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_width: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (gnome-background-properties:1486): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_height: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (gnome-background-properties:1486): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-background-properties:1486): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_width: ass ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 435388 ***