After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 438182 - crash in Document Viewer: Viewing a document
crash in Document Viewer: Viewing a document
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 377785
Product: evince
Classification: Core
Component: general
0.8.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evince Maintainers
Evince Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-05-13 20:05 UTC by guru.parkash
Modified: 2007-05-13 20:09 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18


Description guru.parkash 2007-05-13 20:05:00 UTC 
Version: 0.8.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Viewing a document


Distribution: Unknown
Gnome Release: 2.18.1 2007-04-23 (Archlinux)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.1

System: Linux 2.6.21-ARCH #1 SMP PREEMPT Sun May 6 22:27:01 CEST 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 70200000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Murrina-Industrialler
Icon Theme: micro

Memory status: size: 213848064 vsize: 213848064 resident: 31485952 share: 14368768 rss: 31485952 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1179086786 rtime: 124 utime: 110 stime: 14 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evince'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 47329415460768 (LWP 7903)]
[New Thread 1082132800 (LWP 7904)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002b0bba959ae6 in poll () from /lib/libc.so.6

+ Trace 133992

Thread 2 (Thread 1082132800 (LWP 7904))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 libgnomeui_segv_handle
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 raise
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #4 abort
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #5 __assert_fail
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #6 CairoOutputDev::drawImageMask
    from /usr/lib/libpoppler-glib.so.1
  • #7 Gfx::doImage
    from /usr/lib/libpoppler.so.1
  • #8 Gfx::opBeginImage
    from /usr/lib/libpoppler.so.1
  • #9 Gfx::go
    from /usr/lib/libpoppler.so.1
  • #10 Gfx::display
    from /usr/lib/libpoppler.so.1
  • #11 Gfx::doShowText
    from /usr/lib/libpoppler.so.1
  • #12 Gfx::opShowText
    from /usr/lib/libpoppler.so.1
  • #13 Gfx::go
    from /usr/lib/libpoppler.so.1
  • #14 Gfx::display
    from /usr/lib/libpoppler.so.1
  • #15 Page::displaySlice
    from /usr/lib/libpoppler.so.1
  • #16 poppler_page_render_to_pixbuf
    from /usr/lib/libpoppler-glib.so.1
  • #17 ??
  • #18 ev_job_render_run
  • #19 ??
  • #20 ??
  • #21 g_thread_create_proxy
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #22 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #23 clone
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #24 ?? 


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
JACK tmpdir identified as [/tmp]
(bug-buddy:7866): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: invalid uninstantiatable type `gtk-mnemonic-labels' in cast to `GObject'
(bug-buddy:7866): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_get_data: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
(bug-buddy:7866): GLib-CRITICAL **: g_hash_table_destroy: assertion `hash_table->ref_count > 0' failed
(bug-buddy:7866): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed
 AcpiTool v0.4.7, released 06-Feb-2007
Seems like this system lacks ACPI support or else /proc/acpi is not the place to look for ?
Window manager warning: Buggy client sent a _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW message with a timestamp of 0 for 0x3600003 (Evince Doc)
Window manager warning: meta_window_activate called by a pager with a 0 timestamp; the pager needs to be fixed.
evince: CairoOutputDev.cc:685: virtual void CairoOutputDev::drawImageMask(GfxState*, Object*, Stream*, int, int, GBool, GBool): Assertion `n == 0' failed.
Xlib: unexpected async reply (sequence 0xfc0)!
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Nickolay V. Shmyrev 2007-05-13 20:09:31 UTC 

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 377785 ***