After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 434036 - crash in Main Menu:
crash in Main Menu:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 430074
Product: alacarte
Classification: Applications
Component: general
0.11.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Alacarte Maintainer(s)
Alacarte Maintainer(s)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-04-28 06:01 UTC by craig
Modified: 2007-04-28 17:51 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description craig 2007-04-28 06:01:01 UTC
Version: 0.11.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Fedora release 6.93 (Rawhide)
Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.20-1.3104.fc7 #1 SMP Sat Apr 21 22:20:43 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10299905
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 46829568 vsize: 46829568 resident: 17653760 share: 11653120 rss: 17653760 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1177739370 rtime: 391 utime: 168 stime: 223 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/alacarte'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208297792 (LWP 3166)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x0060f402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208297792 (LWP 3166))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 gmenu_tree_ref
    from /usr/lib/libgnome-menu.so.2
  • #5 gmenu_tree_directory_get_tree
    from /usr/lib/libgnome-menu.so.2
  • #6 ??
    from /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gmenu.so
  • #7 PyObject_GetAttr
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #8 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #9 PyEval_EvalCodeEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #10 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #11 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #12 PyEval_EvalCodeEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #14 PyObject_Call
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #15 ??
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #16 PyObject_Call
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #17 PyEval_CallObjectWithKeywords
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #18 PyObject_CallObject
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #19 ??
    from /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gobject/_gobject.so
  • #20 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #23 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #24 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 gtk_cell_renderer_activate
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #28 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #29 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #30 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #31 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #32 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #33 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #34 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #35 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #36 gtk_propagate_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #37 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #38 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #39 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #40 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #41 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #42 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #43 ??
    from /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtk/_gtk.so
  • #44 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #45 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #46 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #47 PyEval_EvalCodeEx
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #48 PyEval_EvalCode
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #49 ??
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #50 PyRun_FileExFlags
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #51 PyRun_SimpleFileExFlags
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #52 PyRun_AnyFileExFlags
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #53 Py_Main
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #54 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (52 sec old) ---------------------
Checking deps for hal.i386 0-0.5.9-5.fc7 - None
Checking deps for comps-extras.noarch 0-12-1 - u
Checking deps for gmp.i386 0-4.1.4-12.3 - u
Checking deps for comps-extras.noarch 0-11.3-1 - None
Checking deps for cpp.i386 0-4.1.2-8 - None
Checking deps for spamassassin.i386 0-3.2.0-0.4.rc2.fc7 - None
Checking deps for libgomp.i386 0-4.1.2-11 - u
Checking deps for libgcc.i386 0-4.1.2-8 - None
Checking deps for kernel.i686 0-2.6.21-1.3116.fc7 - u
Checking deps for elfutils-libelf.i386 0-0.126-1.fc7 - None
Checking deps for elfutils-libelf.i386 0-0.127-1.fc7 - u
Checking deps for pm-utils.i386 0-0.99.3-2.fc7 - u
Checking deps for cpp.i386 0-4.1.2-11 - u
Checking deps for redhat-artwork.i386 0-5.0.12-6.fc7 - u
"/usr/bin/alacarte": not in executable format: File format not recognized
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 palfrey 2007-04-28 17:51:45 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 430074 ***