GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 433933
crash in Evolution: I was browsing my emails...
Last modified: 2007-04-27 21:42:23 UTC
Version: 2.12.x What were you doing when the application crashed? I was browsing my emails. Distribution: Gentoo Base System release 1.12.10 Gnome Release: 2.18.1 2007-04-17 (Gentoo) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.1 System: Linux 2.6.20-gentoo #3 PREEMPT Tue Feb 13 20:00:59 EET 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10299905 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: . Memory status: size: 157220864 vsize: 157220864 resident: 34287616 share: 17129472 rss: 34287616 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1177696781 rtime: 780 utime: 738 stime: 42 cutime:9 cstime: 7 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.12' Really redefine built-in command "frame"? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal] Really redefine built-in command "thread"? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal] Really redefine built-in command "start"? (y or n) [answered Y; input not from terminal] Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1230080336 (LWP 10370)] [New Thread -1348670576 (LWP 10426)] [New Thread -1331352688 (LWP 10401)] [New Thread -1322898544 (LWP 10399)] [New Thread -1306104944 (LWP 10397)] [New Thread -1297712240 (LWP 10396)] [New Thread -1289319536 (LWP 10395)] [New Thread -1280423024 (LWP 10394)] [New Thread -1272030320 (LWP 10393)] [New Thread -1263637616 (LWP 10392)] [New Thread -1255244912 (LWP 10391)] [New Thread -1246139504 (LWP 10390)] _______________________________________________________________________________ eax:FFFFFE00 ebx:000028CD ecx:BFA62B48 edx:00000000 eflags:00000293 esi:08ECBA80 edi:082314C0 esp:BFA62A64 ebp:BFA62B58 eip:FFFFE410 cs:0073 ds:007B es:007B fs:0000 gs:0033 ss:007B o d I t S z A p C [007B:BFA62A64]---------------------------------------------------------[stack] BFA62A94 : 80 55 66 B7 C0 EE 69 B7 - 00 00 00 00 A0 EE 69 B7 .Uf...i.......i. BFA62A84 : 48 2B A6 BF 00 00 00 00 - 68 BF 61 B7 A4 EE 69 B7 H+......h.a...i. BFA62A74 : 20 07 E4 B7 00 00 00 00 - 05 A8 E0 B7 CD 28 00 00 ............(.. BFA62A64 : 58 2B A6 BF 00 00 00 00 - 48 2B A6 BF FB D2 6A B7 X+......H+....j. [007B:08ECBA80]---------------------------------------------------------[ data] 08ECBA80 : E0 96 4A B7 00 C5 EC 08 - 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ..J............. 08ECBA90 : 0A 00 00 00 0A 00 00 00 - 0A 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ [0073:FFFFE410]---------------------------------------------------------[ code] 0xffffe410 <__kernel_vsyscall+16>: pop %ebp 0xffffe411 <__kernel_vsyscall+17>: pop %edx 0xffffe412 <__kernel_vsyscall+18>: pop %ecx 0xffffe413 <__kernel_vsyscall+19>: ret 0xffffe414 <_fini+1209184896>: nop 0xffffe415 <_fini+1209184897>: nop ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 130946
----------- .xsession-errors (1027836 sec old) --------------------- ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:864:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:864:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:864:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:864:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:864:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:864:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:864:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:864:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:864:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:864:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:864:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:864:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:864:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 407968 ***