After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 431144 - gnome-pilot libraries are not linking to required libraries
gnome-pilot libraries are not linking to required libraries
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 431145
Product: gnome-pilot
Classification: Other
Component: general
2.0.15
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: gnome-pilot Maintainers
gnome-pilot Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-04-18 21:34 UTC by Matthew Barnes
Modified: 2007-04-19 17:28 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Matthew Barnes 2007-04-18 21:34:45 UTC
Forwarding this from a downstream bug report:
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198211

libgnomepilotd, libgnomepilotdconduit, and libgpilotdcm do not link to their required libraries as specified by the Makefile variable GNOME_PILOT_LIBS.

To reproduce (in an RPM-based distribution):

   $ rpm -ql gnome-pilot-devel | grep lib.*so | xargs ldd -r | grep missing

A partial solution to this problem was offered in bug #360190 under the pretense of making --as-needed work, although the problem is more severe than that.

Even with the following patch applied, there's still a few outliers:

   $ rpm -ql gnome-pilot-devel | grep lib.*so | xargs ldd -r | grep missing
   undefined symbol: gnome_pilot_conduit_sync_type_int_to_str      
   (/usr/lib/libgpilotdcm.so)
   undefined symbol: gnome_pilot_conduit_sync_type_str_to_int      
   (/usr/lib/libgpilotdcm.so)
   undefined symbol: gnome_pilot_conduit_set_name  (/usr/lib/libgpilotdcm.so)

I suspect this to be related to the build-order problem between libgpilotdCM and gpilotd, as mentioned in the README file.
Comment 1 Matthew Barnes 2007-04-19 17:27:33 UTC
Hmm, how'd that happen?

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 341145 ***
Comment 2 Matthew Barnes 2007-04-19 17:28:37 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 431145 ***