After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 428875 - crash in Terminal: Nada especial
crash in Terminal: Nada especial
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 348979
Product: gnome-terminal
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: GNOME Terminal Maintainers
GNOME Terminal Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-04-12 02:46 UTC by Daviel Maza
Modified: 2007-04-12 15:09 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description Daviel Maza 2007-04-12 02:46:27 UTC
Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Nada especial


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 73908224 vsize: 0 resident: 73908224 share: 0 rss: 12554240 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1176343490 rtime: 0 utime: 104 stime: 0 cutime:90 cstime: 0 timeout: 14 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 1400

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225947472 (LWP 4570)]
[New Thread -1267401824 (LWP 4861)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1225947472 (LWP 4570))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 g_type_check_is_value_type
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #5 g_value_type_compatible
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #6 g_object_class_override_property
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #7 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_signal_emit
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #9 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #10 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #11 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #16 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 gtk_notebook_popup_enable
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #20 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 gtk_widget_reset_rc_styles
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 gtk_rc_get_theme_dir
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #28 gtk_icon_info_get_type
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #29 g_source_is_destroyed
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #30 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #31 g_main_context_check
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #32 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #33 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #34 ??
  • #35 ??
  • #36 _IO_stdin_used
  • #37 ??
  • #38 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Bruno Boaventura 2007-04-12 15:09:21 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 348979 ***