After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 425880 - Weird gray area appears on window.resize calls while maximized
Weird gray area appears on window.resize calls while maximized
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 136288
Product: epiphany
Classification: Core
Component: General
git master
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Epiphany Maintainers
Marco Pesenti Gritti
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-04-03 14:42 UTC by Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail)
Modified: 2007-04-04 05:38 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Resize calls problem (69.84 KB, image/png)
2007-04-03 14:44 UTC, Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail)
Details

Description Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2007-04-03 14:42:55 UTC
Visit while having Ephy window maximized:
http://www.youtube.com/share?v=W91sqAs-_-g&embed=1

Problem:
The document view gets a free gray space to the right (see screenshot).

Expected:
The window either resizes or the .resize() is ignored

How to solve:
a) Switch to another tab, go back to the broken tab.
or
b) Open the offending website while ephy window is not maximized

Note this javascript on youtube.com:
<script type="text/javascript">
<!-- 

function fillAll()
{
	
	window.resizeTo(590,620); //resize the window to the correct size
	
	window.focus();
}
var remote;
function launch_share(n,u,w,h) {
	remote=window.open(u,n,'width='+w+',height='+h+',resizable=yes,scrollbars=no,status=0');
	remote.opener = self;
	if (remote != null) {
		if (remote.opener == null )
			remote.opener = self;
	}
	remote.focus();
}
//  -->
</script>
Comment 1 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2007-04-03 14:44:09 UTC
Created attachment 85766 [details]
Resize calls problem

Illustrates the problem.
Comment 2 Reinout van Schouwen 2007-04-03 19:03:51 UTC
Dupe of bug 136288?
Comment 3 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2007-04-04 05:38:57 UTC
Indeed.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 136288 ***