GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 423771
Build fails when using -j2 (or above)
Last modified: 2007-03-28 15:58:00 UTC
Build fails with: make[3]: *** No rule to make target `../metadata/librbmetadatasvc.la', needed by `rhythmbox-metadata'. Stop. make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -DGNOMELOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"Rhythmbox\" -I.. -I../lib -I../widgets -DPNG_NO_MMX_CODE -DORBIT2=1 -pthread -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/libgnomeui-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnome-2.0 -I/usr/include/libgnomecanvas-2.0 -I/usr/include/libart-2.0 -I/usr/include/gconf/2 -I/usr/include/libbonoboui-2.0 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/gnome-vfs-2.0/include -I/usr/include/gnome-keyring-1 -I/usr/include/orbit-2.0 -I/usr/include/libbonobo-2.0 -I/usr/include/bonobo-activation-2.0 -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/libglade-2.0 -I/usr/include/gnome-vfs-module-2.0 -pthread -I/usr/include/gstreamer-0.10 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -I/usr/include/libxml2 -I/usr/include/dbus-1.0 -I/usr/lib64/dbus-1.0/include -I/usr/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/lib64/glib-2.0/include -DDBUS_API_SUBJECT_TO_CHANGE -DLIBEXEC_DIR=\"/usr/libexec\" -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic -MT rb-metadata-gst.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/rb-metadata-gst.Tpo -c rb-metadata-gst.c -o rb-metadata-gst.o >/dev/null 2>&1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/rhythmbox-0.9.8/metadata' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/rhythmbox-0.9.8/metadata' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Log attached. I'll provide a patch as soon as I get to it.
Created attachment 85461 [details] build.log Build log
It seems you are trying to build rb 0.9.8, isn't it a duplicate of #411145?
bug #411145 (sorry for the spam, but we should get a nice link that way ;)
Never mind, it is. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 411145 ***