Bug 423367 – crash in XChat-GNOME IRC Chat: Trying to change network...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 423367 - crash in XChat-GNOME IRC Chat: Trying to change network...


Summary:	crash in XChat-GNOME IRC Chat: Trying to change network...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 363642

Product:	xchat-gnome
Classification:	Other
Component:	general
Version:	0.13
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	xchat-gnome maintainers
QA Contact:	xchat-gnome maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-03-27 15:33 UTC by dauoalagio
Modified:	2007-03-29 22:37 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description dauoalagio 2007-03-27 15:33:21 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Trying to change networks.


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 96305152 vsize: 0 resident: 96305152 share: 0 rss: 20197376 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1175009407 rtime: 0 utime: 398 stime: 0 cutime:379 cstime: 0 timeout: 19 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/xchat-gnome'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226697040 (LWP 889)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 122625

Thread 1 (Thread -1226697040 (LWP 889))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 server_get_network
#5 create_channel_list
#6 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#7 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 _gtk_action_emit_activate
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 gtk_action_activate
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 gtk_widget_activate
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 gtk_menu_shell_activate_item
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#20 gtk_menu_shell_append
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 gtk_menu_reorder_child
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 g_value_set_boxed
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#24 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#25 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#26 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#27 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#28 gtk_widget_get_default_style
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#29 gtk_propagate_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#30 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#31 _gdk_events_init
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#33 g_main_context_check
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#34 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#35 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#36 fe_main
#37 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 David Trowbridge 2007-03-29 22:37:41 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 363642 ***