After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 418590 - crash in CD/DVD Creator: Surfing the web with fir...
crash in CD/DVD Creator: Surfing the web with fir...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 365638
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-03-15 14:36 UTC by john
Modified: 2007-03-17 14:29 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description john 2007-03-15 14:36:23 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Surfing the web with firefox.  As far as I can tell nothing is crashing but I am getting one of these bug reporting tool boxes every few minutes.


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 48304128 vsize: 0 resident: 48304128 share: 0 rss: 13357056 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1173962032 rtime: 0 utime: 92 stime: 0 cutime:84 cstime: 0 timeout: 8 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226508624 (LWP 5267)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1226508624 (LWP 5267))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #5 raise
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #6 abort
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #7 g_logv
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_log
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 nautilus_directory_async_state_changed
  • #10 nautilus_directory_async_state_changed
  • #11 nautilus_directory_async_state_changed
  • #12 nautilus_directory_async_state_changed
  • #13 nautilus_undo_transaction_unregister_object
  • #14 nautilus_directory_async_state_changed
  • #15 POA_Nautilus_MetafileMonitor__init
  • #16 POA_Nautilus_MetafileMonitor__init
  • #17 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
  • #18 g_type_create_instance
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_object_set
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_object_newv
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 g_object_new_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 g_object_new
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #23 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
  • #24 nautilus_undo_transaction_unregister_object
  • #25 POA_Nautilus_MetafileMonitor__init
  • #26 POA_Nautilus_MetafileMonitor__init
  • #27 nautilus_clipboard_monitor_emit_changed
  • #28 nautilus_directory_async_state_changed
  • #29 nautilus_directory_async_state_changed
  • #30 gnome_vfs_job_get_count
    from /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #31 ??
  • #32 ??
  • #33 ??
  • #34 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0
  • #35 ??
  • #36 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #37 ??
  • #38 g_slice_alloc
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #39 g_source_is_destroyed
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #40 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #41 g_main_context_check
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #42 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #43 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #44 POA_Nautilus_MetafileMonitor__init
  • #45 __libc_start_main
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #46 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 André Klapper 2007-03-17 14:29:01 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 365638 ***