After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 415863 - crash in Evolution: Deleting mail.
crash in Evolution: Deleting mail.
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 239441
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.8.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-03-07 22:45 UTC by clinahan
Modified: 2007-12-06 01:07 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description clinahan 2007-03-07 22:45:25 UTC 
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Deleting mail.


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 188223488 vsize: 0 resident: 188223488 share: 0 rss: 63946752 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1173304914 rtime: 0 utime: 6319 stime: 0 cutime:5989 cstime: 0 timeout: 330 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1232628048 (LWP 20475)]
[New Thread -1329595488 (LWP 21003)]
[New Thread -1310721120 (LWP 20503)]
[New Thread -1300784224 (LWP 20502)]
[New Thread -1299690592 (LWP 20494)]
[New Thread -1291297888 (LWP 20492)]
[New Thread -1282905184 (LWP 20490)]
[New Thread -1274512480 (LWP 20489)]
[New Thread -1266119776 (LWP 20487)]
[New Thread -1246544992 (LWP 20486)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 116726

Thread 1 (Thread -1232628048 (LWP 20475))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 segv_redirect
    at main.c line 426
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 126
  • #6 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 129
  • #7 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 129
  • #8 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 129
  • #9 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 129
  • #10 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 129
  • #11 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 129
  • #12 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 129
  • #13 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 129
  • #14 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 129
  • #15 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 129
  • #16 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 129
  • #17 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 129
  • #18 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 129
  • #19 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 129
  • #20 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 129
  • #21 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 129
  • #22 fill_map
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 129
  • #23 etta_sort_info_changed
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 825
  • #24 resort_model
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 751
  • #25 g_source_is_destroyed
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #26 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #27 g_main_context_check
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #29 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #30 main
    at main.c line 615
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 






Comment 1


Milan Crha





          2007-09-10 12:48:54 UTC
        



Just a wild guess, this can be caused because of same issue like in bug 239441, even in this trace it comes much further than in that second. Can you reproduce this on actual version of evolution (with applied patch from that bug), please?






Comment 2


Tobias Mueller





          2007-09-25 01:50:41 UTC
        



(In reply to comment #1)
> Just a wild guess, this can be caused because of same issue like in bug 239441,
I think so as well.

> Can you reproduce
> this on actual version of evolution (with applied patch from that bug), please?
> 

Changing to NEEDINFO.






Comment 3


Tobias Mueller





          2007-12-06 01:07:14 UTC
        



Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 239441 ***