After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 415664 - crash in Movie Player:
crash in Movie Player:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 364037
Product: totem
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: General Totem maintainer(s)
General Totem maintainer(s)
: 415662 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-03-07 11:19 UTC by sempreceibe
Modified: 2007-03-07 12:28 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description sempreceibe 2007-03-07 11:19:24 UTC 
Version: 2.16.2

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 134746112 vsize: 0 resident: 134746112 share: 0 rss: 32780288 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1173266359 rtime: 0 utime: 82 stime: 0 cutime:75 cstime: 0 timeout: 7 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/totem'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225726288 (LWP 16676)]
[New Thread -1329501280 (LWP 16688)]
[New Thread -1312273504 (LWP 16686)]
[New Thread -1303880800 (LWP 16685)]
[New Thread -1293599840 (LWP 16684)]
[New Thread -1281107040 (LWP 16683)]
[New Thread -1272444000 (LWP 16682)]
[New Thread -1264014432 (LWP 16679)]
[New Thread -1247585376 (LWP 16678)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 116570

Thread 5 (Thread -1293599840 (LWP 16684))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 ??
  • #5 ??
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ?? 






Comment 1


Pedro Villavicencio





          2007-03-07 12:27:28 UTC
        



Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 364037 ***






Comment 2


Pedro Villavicencio





          2007-03-07 12:28:27 UTC
        



*** Bug 415662 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***