Bug 415043 – crash in System Log: Opening visor de registr...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 415043 - crash in System Log: Opening visor de registr...


Summary:	crash in System Log: Opening visor de registr...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 355557

Product:	gnome-utils
Classification:	Deprecated
Component:	logview
Version:	2.16.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	gnome-utils Maintainers
QA Contact:	gnome-utils Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-03-05 20:01 UTC by agoujonm
Modified:	2007-03-06 00:14 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description agoujonm 2007-03-05 20:01:41 UTC

Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Opening visor de registros de actividad


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 37474304 vsize: 0 resident: 37474304 share: 0 rss: 17817600 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1173124883 rtime: 0 utime: 97 stime: 0 cutime:76 cstime: 0 timeout: 21 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-system-log'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1224808784 (LWP 5465)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 116111

Thread 1 (Thread -1224808784 (LWP 5465))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 ??
#5 ??
#6 ??
#7 ??
#8 g_free
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#9 ??
#10 ??
#11 ??
#12 ??
#13 ??
#14 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Susana 2007-03-06 00:14:04 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 355557 ***