Bug 413762 – crash in Calculator:

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 413762 - crash in Calculator:


Summary:	crash in Calculator:


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 354730

Product:	gnome-calculator
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Rich Burridge
QA Contact:	Rich Burridge

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-03-02 07:23 UTC by tanvir_math
Modified:	2007-03-02 15:29 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description tanvir_math 2007-03-02 07:23:41 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 75747328 vsize: 0 resident: 75747328 share: 0 rss: 13533184 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1172817285 rtime: 0 utime: 257 stime: 0 cutime:245 cstime: 0 timeout: 12 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gcalctool'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1224825168 (LWP 7665)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 115126

Thread 1 (Thread -1224825168 (LWP 7665))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 __kernel_vsyscall
#5 raise
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#6 abort
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#7 __assert_fail
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#8 matherr
#9 matherr
#10 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 gtk_button_clicked
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 gtk_button_set_alignment
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 g_value_set_boxed
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#23 gtk_button_released
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 gtk_button_released
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#25 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 g_value_set_boxed
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#27 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#28 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#29 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#30 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#31 gtk_widget_get_default_style
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 gtk_propagate_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#33 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#34 _gdk_events_init
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#35 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#36 g_main_context_check
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#37 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#38 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#39 matherr
#40 __libc_start_main
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#41 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Susana 2007-03-02 15:29:39 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 354730 ***