After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 406451 - crash in Ekiga Softphone:
crash in Ekiga Softphone:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 359655
Product: ekiga
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.0.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Ekiga maintainers
Ekiga maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-02-10 17:20 UTC by karl.lanzinger
Modified: 2007-02-10 17:45 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description karl.lanzinger 2007-02-10 17:20:02 UTC
Version: 2.0.3

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 138731520 vsize: 0 resident: 138731520 share: 0 rss: 28147712 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1171127737 rtime: 0 utime: 534 stime: 0 cutime:490 cstime: 0 timeout: 44 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/ekiga'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1247586640 (LWP 11659)]
[New Thread -1315161184 (LWP 12717)]
[New Thread -1315427424 (LWP 12336)]
[New Thread -1388405856 (LWP 12063)]
[New Thread -1380013152 (LWP 12061)]
[New Thread -1250337888 (LWP 11920)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 2 (Thread -1315161184 (LWP 12717))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 typeinfo name for PList<OpalConnection>
    from /usr/lib/libopal.so.2.2
  • #5 ??
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
  • #10 ??
  • #11 ??
  • #12 ??
  • #13 ??
  • #14 ??
  • #15 ??
  • #16 ??
  • #17 ??
  • #18 ??
  • #19 ??
  • #20 ??
  • #21 ??
  • #22 ??
  • #23 ??
  • #24 ??
  • #25 ??
  • #26 ??
  • #27 ??
  • #28 ??
  • #29 ??
  • #30 ??
  • #31 ??
  • #32 ??
  • #33 ??
  • #34 ??
  • #35 ??
  • #36 ??
  • #37 ??
  • #38 ??
  • #39 ??
  • #40 ??
  • #41 ??
  • #42 ??
  • #43 ??
  • #44 ??
  • #45 ??
  • #46 ??
  • #47 ??
  • #48 ??
  • #49 ??
  • #50 ??
  • #51 ??

Comment 1 Damien Sandras 2007-02-10 17:45:50 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 359655 ***