After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 405859 - crash in Evolution: VENDO ANEXO DE E-MAIL
crash in Evolution: VENDO ANEXO DE E-MAIL
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 340165
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.8.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-02-08 19:08 UTC by wilsonalcantara
Modified: 2007-02-09 07:44 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description wilsonalcantara 2007-02-08 19:08:41 UTC 
What were you doing when the application crashed?
VENDO ANEXO DE E-MAIL


Distribution: Red Hat Linux release 3 
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 342188032 vsize: 342188032 resident: 55062528 share: 23457792 rss: 55062528 rss_rlim: -1
CPU usage: start_time: 1170959754 rtime: 2473 utime: 2316 stime: 157 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 47672091536752 (LWP 4993)]
[New Thread 1115969872 (LWP 5071)]
[New Thread 1115703632 (LWP 5069)]
[New Thread 1107310928 (LWP 5008)]
[New Thread 1098918224 (LWP 5007)]
[New Thread 1090525520 (LWP 5006)]
[New Thread 1082132816 (LWP 4997)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002b5b81c8f5cf in waitpid () from /lib/libc.so.6

+ Trace 109111

Thread 7 (Thread 1082132816 (LWP 4997))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 em_sync_stream_get_type
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #3 em_sync_stream_get_type
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #4 em_format_html_display_new
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #5 em_format_part_as
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #6 em_format_part
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #7 em_format_get_type
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #8 em_format_part_as
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #9 em_format_part
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #10 em_format_html_new
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #11 em_format_html_new
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #12 mail_enable_stop
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #13 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #14 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #15 clone
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #16 ??

Thread 6 (Thread 1090525520 (LWP 5006))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #3 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 clone
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #5 ??

Thread 5 (Thread 1098918224 (LWP 5007))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #3 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 clone
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #5 ??

Thread 4 (Thread 1107310928 (LWP 5008))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #3 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 clone
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #5 ?? 






Comment 1


Kjartan Maraas





          2007-02-09 07:44:42 UTC
        



Likely a duplicate of bug 340165 or 333864. Fixed in 2.8.3 and 2.9.x

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 340165 ***