After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 404355 - crash in Evolution: Looking at high-res pict...
crash in Evolution: Looking at high-res pict...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 273386
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.8.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-02-04 18:39 UTC by Vincent Maglione
Modified: 2007-04-16 20:18 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16

Attachments
Plain text file (hopefully) containing debugging information you'll need (7.76 KB, text/plain)
2007-02-05 18:22 UTC, Vincent Maglione 		Details
Debug symbols attempt numero dos (9.12 KB, text/plain)
2007-02-05 20:23 UTC, Vincent Maglione 		Details

Description Vincent Maglione 2007-02-04 18:39:48 UTC 
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Looking at high-res pictures from within an e-mail. It crashed when I opened the third one.


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 341225472 vsize: 341225472 resident: 91127808 share: 18612224 rss: 91127808 rss_rlim: -1
CPU usage: start_time: 1170614255 rtime: 1086 utime: 974 stime: 112 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 47528756391280 (LWP 5984)]
[New Thread 1115969872 (LWP 6156)]
[New Thread 1107577168 (LWP 6155)]
[New Thread 1107310928 (LWP 6137)]
[New Thread 1098918224 (LWP 6120)]
[New Thread 1090525520 (LWP 6119)]
[New Thread 1082132816 (LWP 6116)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002b3a225815cf in waitpid () from /lib/libc.so.6

+ Trace 107975

Thread 7 (Thread 1082132816 (LWP 6116))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 em_sync_stream_get_type
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #3 em_sync_stream_get_type
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #4 em_format_html_new
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #5 mail_enable_stop
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #6 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #7 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #8 clone
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #9 ??

Thread 6 (Thread 1090525520 (LWP 6119))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #3 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 clone
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #5 ??

Thread 5 (Thread 1098918224 (LWP 6120))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #3 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 clone
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #5 ??

Thread 4 (Thread 1107310928 (LWP 6137))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #3 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 clone
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #5 ??

Thread 2 (Thread 1115969872 (LWP 6156))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #3 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 clone
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #5 ?? 






Comment 1


palfrey





          2007-02-04 21:00:24 UTC
        



Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so. Thanks in advance!







Comment 2


Vincent Maglione





          2007-02-05 18:22:17 UTC
        



Created attachment 81947 [details]
Plain text file (hopefully) containing debugging information you'll need

Hopefully I did this correctly. Followed the ubuntu-specific instructions from http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces/DistroSpecificInstructions <-there and copied/pasted from bug-buddy. 

Hope that helps!






Comment 3


palfrey





          2007-02-05 19:57:11 UTC
        



Unfortunately the trace hasn't improved much. It's suffering from an existing problem that sometimes happens with Bug Buddy interfering with the stack trace. Not your fault, but we'd still like to get a better trace. Can you try running evolution under gdb (see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces/Details#gdb-not-yet-running for how to do this) and we should be able to get a better trace.

Thanks for your feedback here!






Comment 4


Vincent Maglione





          2007-02-05 20:23:33 UTC
        



Created attachment 81953 [details]
Debug symbols attempt numero dos

How's this?






Comment 5


palfrey





          2007-02-05 20:32:17 UTC
        



Much better! Looks similar to Bug 392391 and Bug 358437, but I think this is still  sufficiently different that it's possibly a different bug. Marking as NEW, and now hopefully the Evolution developers will be able to find out exactly what went wrong here with the information you've provided. Thanks!






Comment 6


palfrey





          2007-02-05 20:34:05 UTC
        



Copying fixed stacktrace into the comments to make searching for duplicates easier.





+
Trace
    108274






    

  • 
#0
em_format_set_inline

    
                at em-format.c
                  line
                  978

    

    • 

  • 
#1
IA__g_closure_invoke

    
                at gclosure.c
                  line
                  490

    

    • 

  • 
#2
signal_emit_unlocked_R

    
                at gsignal.c
                  line
                  2440

    

    • 

  • 
#3
IA__g_signal_emit_valist

    
                at gsignal.c
                  line
                  2199

    

    • 

  • 
#4
IA__g_signal_emit

    
                at gsignal.c
                  line
                  2243

    

    • 

  • 
#5
gtk_real_button_released

    
                at gtkbutton.c
                  line
                  1484

    

    • 

  • 
#6
IA__g_closure_invoke

    
                at gclosure.c
                  line
                  490

    

    • 

  • 
#7
signal_emit_unlocked_R

    
                at gsignal.c
                  line
                  2370

    

    • 

  • 
#8
IA__g_signal_emit_valist

    
                at gsignal.c
                  line
                  2199

    

    • 

  • 
#9
IA__g_signal_emit

    
                at gsignal.c
                  line
                  2243

    

    • 

  • 
#10
gtk_button_button_release

    
                at gtkbutton.c
                  line
                  1377

    

    • 

  • 
#11
_gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED

    
                at gtkmarshalers.c
                  line
                  84

    

    • 













Comment 7


Vincent Maglione





          2007-02-05 20:43:15 UTC
        



Great, thanks! In the meantime, I'll just download photos from e-mails. 






Comment 8


palfrey





          2007-04-16 20:18:09 UTC
        



Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 273386 ***