After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 401468 - crash in Screen Resolution: opening screen resolutio...
crash in Screen Resolution: opening screen resolutio...
Status: RESOLVED INCOMPLETE
Product: gnome-control-center
Classification: Core
Component: Display
2.17.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Control-Center Maintainers
Control-Center Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-01-27 21:11 UTC by romstev
Modified: 2007-02-28 21:13 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description romstev 2007-01-27 21:11:39 UTC
Version: 2.17.90

What were you doing when the application crashed?
opening screen resolution tool in new Gnome Control Center




Distribution: Fedora Core release 6.90 (Rawhide)
Gnome Release: 2.17.90 2007-01-21 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.17.3

System: Linux 2.6.19-1.2914.fc7 #1 SMP Fri Jan 26 18:42:25 EST 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 70200000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Enabled

Memory status: size: 54145024 vsize: 0 resident: 54145024 share: 0 rss: 11333632 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1169932161 rtime: 0 utime: 14 stime: 0 cutime:10 cstime: 0 timeout: 4 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-display-properties'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208346400 (LWP 4293)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x0090b402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208346400 (LWP 4293))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #5 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOXED
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #7 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #8 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_signal_emit_by_name
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #11 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 gtk_widget_size_request
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOXED
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_signal_emit_by_name
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 gtk_widget_size_request
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOXED
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #26 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #27 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #28 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #29 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #30 g_signal_emit_by_name
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #31 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #32 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #33 gtk_widget_size_request
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #34 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #35 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__BOXED
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #36 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #37 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #38 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #39 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #40 g_signal_emit_by_name
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #41 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #42 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #43 gtk_widget_size_request
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #44 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #45 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #46 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #47 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #48 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #49 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #50 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #51 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #52 gtk_widget_show
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #53 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (9 sec old) ---------------------
closing
closing
Window manager warning: Buggy client sent a _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW message with a timestamp of 0 for 0x5a00003 (Yum Extend)
Window manager warning: meta_window_activate called by a pager with a 0 timestamp; the pager needs to be fixed.
GTK Accessibility Module initialized
Bonobo accessibility support initialized
** (GNOME Control Center:4288): WARNING **: key not found [/desktop/gnome/applications/main-menu/cc_actions_list]
GTK Accessibility Module initialized
Bonobo accessibility support initialized
GTK Accessibility Module initialized
Bonobo accessibility support initialized
GTK Accessibility Module initialized
Bonobo accessibility support initialized
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Jens Granseuer 2007-01-27 21:15:49 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so. Thanks in advance!

We'd need debugging symbols for control-center, gtk+, and glib.
Comment 2 Bruno Boaventura 2007-02-28 21:13:25 UTC
Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided. Please feel free to reopen this bug if you can provide the information asked for.
Thanks!