After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 400423 - subdivide the stock icons combobox widget into multiple columns
subdivide the stock icons combobox widget into multiple columns
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 359640
Product: glade
Classification: Applications
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: Glade 3 Maintainers
Glade 3 Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-01-24 23:05 UTC by Jean-François Fortin Tam
Modified: 2007-01-25 02:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description Jean-François Fortin Tam 2007-01-24 23:05:15 UTC
glade3 has a lot of usability improvements, but one thing still makes me scream every time I have to use it: the stock icons selector.

When I create a stock button and click the combobox to select which stock icon I want to assign, the list is eight times the height of my screen. I usually end lost in that list, scrolling is very slow and it becomes very frustrating finding icons.

I noticed in glade3 that GTK allows subdividing comboboxes into columns. Glade should use this to display more stock icons at once, requiring less scrolling and making a more efficient use of horizontal space. What do you think?

Other information:
Comment 1 Vincent Geddes 2007-01-24 23:52:42 UTC
We are working on the stock-item selection problem, but we don't intend to use combo-boxes at all though. We are going to use dialogs instead.

Recently, I created a named-icon chooser dialog, which allows a user to edit any  icon-name properties on a widget in a very usable way. I intend to modify the dialog to support stock icons, and I think this can be ready quite soon.

Check out #359640 for more details on this dialog. If you want to, please give any input or opinions you have.
  
Comment 2 Jean-François Fortin Tam 2007-01-25 02:47:21 UTC
I actually love what I saw so far in #359640, so I'm marking myself this bug a duplicate of it :) looking forward to see this!

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 359640 ***