After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 399646 - crash in Text Editor: closing textedit while o...
crash in Text Editor: closing textedit while o...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 363172
Product: gedit
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Gedit maintainers
Gedit maintainers
: 407193 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-01-23 03:28 UTC by ropers
Modified: 2007-03-24 11:10 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description ropers 2007-01-23 03:28:49 UTC
Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
closing textedit while opening internet explorer (IEs4Linux) -- cf. tatanka.com.br/ies4linux/


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 82198528 vsize: 0 resident: 82198528 share: 0 rss: 24252416 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1169502364 rtime: 0 utime: 23455 stime: 0 cutime:22465 cstime: 0 timeout: 990 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gedit'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1227134784 (LWP 21360)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1227134784 (LWP 21360))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #5 raise
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #6 abort
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #7 g_logv
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_log
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_assert_warning
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 _gtk_text_btree_tag
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #11 _gtk_text_btree_notify_will_remove_tag
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 _gtk_text_buffer_notify_will_remove_tag
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 gtk_text_tag_new
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 gtk_text_tag_new
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 g_hash_table_foreach
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #16 gtk_text_tag_table_foreach
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 _gtk_text_tag_table_remove_buffer
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 gtk_text_buffer_cut_clipboard
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 gtk_source_buffer_new_with_language
    from /usr/lib/libgtksourceview-1.0.so.0
  • #20 gedit_document_new
  • #21 g_object_unref
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 init_gobject
    from /var/lib/python-support/python2.4/gtk-2.0/gobject/_gobject.so
  • #23 initgc
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.4.so.1.0
  • #24 PyGC_Collect
    from /usr/lib/libpython2.4.so.1.0
  • #25 gedit_text_region_intersect
  • #26 g_source_is_destroyed
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #27 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_main_context_check
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #29 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #30 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #31 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Mariano Suárez-Alvarez 2007-01-23 09:24:16 UTC
This is a dup of bug 373476, which got closed INCOMPLETE, so I'll not dup it to keep it alive.

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so. Thanks in advance!
Comment 2 palfrey 2007-02-21 17:47:23 UTC
*** Bug 407193 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Paolo Maggi 2007-03-24 11:10:29 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 363172 ***