Bug 397660 – crash in Terminal: Trying to get in the sus...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 397660 - crash in Terminal: Trying to get in the sus...


Summary:	crash in Terminal: Trying to get in the sus...


Status:	RESOLVED INCOMPLETE

Product:	gnome-terminal
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.16.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	GNOME Terminal Maintainers
QA Contact:	GNOME Terminal Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Duplicates:	408497 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-01-17 15:26 UTC by aferrel
Modified:	2007-07-15 10:13 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description aferrel 2007-01-17 15:26:38 UTC

Version: 2.16.0

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Trying to get in the suspended mode, when I woke the computer the crash message appeared


Distribution: Fedora Core release 6 (Zod)
Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 102395904 vsize: 0 resident: 102395904 share: 0 rss: 10899456 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1168986965 rtime: 0 utime: 2202 stime: 0 cutime:1784 cstime: 0 timeout: 418 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208142128 (LWP 2329)]
[New Thread -1213711472 (LWP 2334)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x0049a402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 102989

Thread 1 (Thread -1208142128 (LWP 2329))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 mbrtowc
from /lib/libc.so.6
#5 re_string_reconstruct
from /lib/libc.so.6
#6 re_search_internal
from /lib/libc.so.6
#7 regexec
from /lib/libc.so.6
#8 vte_terminal_accessible_new
from /usr/lib/libvte.so.9
#9 vte_terminal_get_text
from /usr/lib/libvte.so.9
#10 vte_terminal_get_text
from /usr/lib/libvte.so.9
#11 vte_terminal_get_text
from /usr/lib/libvte.so.9
#12 gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 g_value_set_static_boxed
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 g_signal_override_class_closure
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 gtk_widget_get_default_style
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 gtk_propagate_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#20 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 gdk_add_client_message_filter
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#23 g_main_context_check
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#24 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#25 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
#27 __libc_start_main
from /lib/libc.so.6
#28 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Bruno Boaventura 2007-01-18 03:08:46 UTC

Unique trace

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so. Thanks in advance!

Comment 2 Mariano Suárez-Alvarez 2007-02-16 14:10:06 UTC

*** Bug 408497 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 Teppo Turtiainen 2007-07-15 10:13:14 UTC

Closing this bug report as no further information has been provided. Please feel free to reopen this bug if you can provide the information asked for.
Thanks!