After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 395569 - Crash when selecting chinese characters
Crash when selecting chinese characters
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 364329
Product: gedit
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.15.x
Other Linux
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Gedit maintainers
Gedit maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-01-11 21:16 UTC by xelnaga
Modified: 2007-01-16 18:05 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description xelnaga 2007-01-11 21:16:30 UTC
Version: 2.15.9

What were you doing when the application crashed?
I am editing  my txt, I just input several chinese characters and  then the problem  appears.


Distribution: Fedora Core release 6 (Zod)
Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 89616384 vsize: 0 resident: 89616384 share: 0 rss: 20160512 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1168545157 rtime: 0 utime: 319 stime: 0 cutime:299 cstime: 0 timeout: 20 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gedit'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/nosegneg/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208284416 (LWP 6006)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x002c0402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208284416 (LWP 6006))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/i686/nosegneg/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #5 raise
    from /lib/i686/nosegneg/libc.so.6
  • #6 abort
    from /lib/i686/nosegneg/libc.so.6
  • #7 g_logv
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_log
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_assert_warning
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 gtk_text_line_segment_split
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #11 gtk_text_line_segment_split
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 gtk_text_line_segment_split
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 gtk_text_mark_set_visible
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 gtk_text_mark_set_visible
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 gtk_text_buffer_select_range
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #16 gtk_text_view_new_with_buffer
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 gtk_text_view_new_with_buffer
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 gtk_source_view_get_show_line_numbers
    from /usr/lib/libgtksourceview-1.0.so.0
  • #19 gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__VOID
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_value_set_static_boxed
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 g_signal_override_class_closure
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #23 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #24 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #25 gtk_widget_get_default_style
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 gtk_propagate_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #28 gdk_add_client_message_filter
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #29 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #30 g_main_context_check
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #31 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #32 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #33 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Francesco Mari 2007-01-16 18:05:45 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 364329 ***