After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 395486 - crash in Terminal: Working on a template fo...
crash in Terminal: Working on a template fo...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 353498
Product: gnome-terminal
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: GNOME Terminal Maintainers
GNOME Terminal Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-01-11 18:08 UTC by admiraltex
Modified: 2007-01-12 14:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description admiraltex 2007-01-11 18:08:47 UTC 
Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Working on a template for MediaWiki for www.lcarsos.net.


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 52019200 vsize: 0 resident: 52019200 share: 0 rss: 16773120 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1168440884 rtime: 0 utime: 7059 stime: 0 cutime:5378 cstime: 0 timeout: 1681 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 204

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226033488 (LWP 5318)]
[New Thread -1245873248 (LWP 5324)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 101325

Thread 1 (Thread -1226033488 (LWP 5318))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 gtk_widget_style_get_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #5 gtk_widget_style_get
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #6 gtk_widget_style_get
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #7 gtk_widget_style_get
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #8 _gtk_menu_item_is_selectable
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #9 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #10 gtk_widget_style_get
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #11 gtk_widget_style_get
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 gtk_widget_queue_resize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 gtk_menu_shell_select_first
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #16 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #20 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 gtk_widget_reset_rc_styles
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 gtk_rc_get_theme_dir
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 gtk_icon_info_get_type
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 g_source_is_destroyed
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #29 g_main_context_check
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #30 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #31 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #32 ??
  • #33 ??
  • #34 _IO_stdin_used
  • #35 ??
  • #36 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 






Comment 1


palfrey





          2007-01-12 01:28:35 UTC
        



Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 353498 ***






Comment 2


admiraltex





          2007-01-12 14:47:37 UTC
        



Taking a look at the backtrace here and the one for 353498, the function calls are different.  Might be a different one, might not.  I will still see if I can get a debug version.  There does not seem to be one in the ubuntu repositories that I have setup.