After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 395209 - crash in Terminal:
crash in Terminal:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 394890
Product: gnome-terminal
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: GNOME Terminal Maintainers
GNOME Terminal Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-01-10 23:08 UTC by aoki
Modified: 2007-01-11 22:14 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description aoki 2007-01-10 23:08:29 UTC
Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Fedora Core release 6 (Rawhide)
Gnome Release: 2.17.2 2006-11-07 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.17.3

System: Linux 2.6.19-1.2906.fc7 #0 SMP Tue Jan 9 19:06:42 JST 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 70101000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Enabled

Memory status: size: 267964416 vsize: 267964416 resident: 10375168 share: 8151040 rss: 10375168 rss_rlim: -1
CPU usage: start_time: 1168470505 rtime: 11 utime: 8 stime: 3 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 46912535492048 (LWP 3001)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x0000003c8c80d7c5 in waitpid () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

Thread 1 (Thread 46912535492048 (LWP 3001))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 libgnomeui_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 ??
  • #4 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
    from /usr/lib64/libvte.so.9
  • #5 ??
  • #6 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
    from /usr/lib64/libvte.so.9
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 vte_terminal_accessible_new
    from /usr/lib64/libvte.so.9
  • #10 _vte_debug_parse_string
    from /usr/lib64/libvte.so.9
  • #11 vte_terminal_set_emulation
    from /usr/lib64/libvte.so.9
  • #12 vte_terminal_feed_child
    from /usr/lib64/libvte.so.9
  • #13 g_type_create_instance
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_object_set
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 g_object_newv
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 g_object_new_valist
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 g_object_new
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 vte_terminal_new
    from /usr/lib64/libvte.so.9
  • #19 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
  • #20 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
  • #21 g_type_create_instance
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 g_object_set
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #23 g_object_newv
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #24 g_object_new_valist
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #25 g_object_new
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #26 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
  • #27 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
  • #28 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
  • #29 __libc_start_main
    from /lib64/libc.so.6
  • #30 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
  • #31 ??
  • #32 ??
  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

Comment 1 palfrey 2007-01-11 17:14:04 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so. Thanks in advance!
Comment 2 Susana 2007-01-11 17:28:18 UTC
*** Bug 395349 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Behdad Esfahbod 2007-01-11 22:14:16 UTC
Fixed in trunk.

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 394890 ***