After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 389548 - crash in Image Viewer:
crash in Image Viewer:
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 357405
Product: eog
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: EOG Maintainers
EOG Maintainers
: 411895 425979 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-12-25 20:30 UTC by piter
Modified: 2007-04-09 14:24 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description piter 2006-12-25 20:30:06 UTC 
Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 211206144 vsize: 211206144 resident: 56635392 share: 12423168 rss: 56635392 rss_rlim: -1
CPU usage: start_time: 1167078580 rtime: 832 utime: 662 stime: 170 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/eog'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 47025550859808 (LWP 6846)]
[New Thread 1090525520 (LWP 6852)]
[New Thread 1082132816 (LWP 6847)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002ac4f98827f6 in poll () from /lib/libc.so.6

+ Trace 96936

Thread 2 (Thread 1090525520 (LWP 6852))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 raise
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #4 abort
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #5 g_logv
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 g_log
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 g_assert_warning
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 eog_image_load
  • #9 ??
  • #10 ??
  • #11 ??
  • #12 ??
  • #13 ??
  • #14 ??
  • #15 ??
  • #16 ??
  • #17 ?? 






Comment 1


Claudio Saavedra





          2006-12-25 21:29:12 UTC
        



Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 357405 ***






Comment 2


Christian Kirbach





          2007-02-25 13:33:17 UTC
        



*** Bug 411895 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 3


Susana





          2007-04-09 14:24:35 UTC
        



*** Bug 425979 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***