After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 388672 - crash in Terminal: i don konw exactly . but...
crash in Terminal: i don konw exactly . but...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 353498
Product: gnome-terminal
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: GNOME Terminal Maintainers
GNOME Terminal Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-12-22 17:03 UTC by bthink
Modified: 2006-12-22 19:49 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description bthink 2006-12-22 17:03:24 UTC
Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
i don konw exactly .
but i do install the vlc with graphic soft ware istaller which called ''xin li de '' in chinese.


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 106864640 vsize: 0 resident: 106864640 share: 0 rss: 18116608 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1166799895 rtime: 0 utime: 1022 stime: 0 cutime:809 cstime: 0 timeout: 213 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 60

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226864976 (LWP 5672)]
[New Thread -1301501024 (LWP 5678)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1226864976 (LWP 5672))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 gtk_widget_style_get_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #5 gtk_widget_style_get
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #6 gtk_widget_style_get
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #7 gtk_widget_style_get
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #8 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #9 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #10 gtk_widget_style_get
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #11 gtk_widget_style_get
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 gtk_widget_queue_resize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 gtk_notebook_popup_enable
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #16 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #20 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 gtk_widget_reset_rc_styles
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 gtk_rc_get_theme_dir
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 gtk_icon_info_get_type
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 g_source_is_destroyed
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #29 g_main_context_check
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #30 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #31 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #32 ??
  • #33 ??
  • #34 _IO_stdin_used
  • #35 ??
  • #36 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Susana 2006-12-22 19:49:15 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 353498 ***