After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 387143 - crash in Evolution: Was deleting mails from ...
crash in Evolution: Was deleting mails from ...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 239441
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.8.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
Evolution QA team
: 388138 388515 388569 390779 391639 397461 398233 403372 404857 406106 409776 412341 412620 413202 413722 413815 417751 417802 422910 430687 451650 464438 472288 477958 480798 480808 481282 483161 483316 486729 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-12-18 13:16 UTC by V Sridhar
Modified: 2007-10-15 10:09 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description V Sridhar 2006-12-18 13:16:17 UTC 
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Was deleting mails from sent items. Deleted two, sent a reply to one using reply all. Then focus came back to sent items. Tried clicking previous mail. Mail hung. Bug Buddy came up


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 377970688 vsize: 0 resident: 377970688 share: 0 rss: 112304128 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1166432868 rtime: 0 utime: 13071 stime: 0 cutime:12663 cstime: 0 timeout: 408 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1232632144 (LWP 25274)]
[New Thread -1428800608 (LWP 25713)]
[New Thread -1375229024 (LWP 25299)]
[New Thread -1376781408 (LWP 25297)]
[New Thread -1366701152 (LWP 25295)]
[New Thread -1357915232 (LWP 25289)]
[New Thread -1349522528 (LWP 25288)]
[New Thread -1306752096 (LWP 25286)]
[New Thread -1298359392 (LWP 25285)]
[New Thread -1289491552 (LWP 25284)]
[New Thread -1281098848 (LWP 25283)]
[New Thread -1271247968 (LWP 25282)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 95116

Thread 1 (Thread -1232632144 (LWP 25274))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 segv_redirect
    at main.c line 426
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 resort_node
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 158
  • #6 etta_sort_info_changed
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 824
  • #7 resort_model
    at e-tree-table-adapter.c line 751
  • #8 g_source_is_destroyed
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_main_context_check
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #12 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #13 main
    at main.c line 615
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 






Comment 1


Jonathon Jongsma





          2006-12-18 19:14:54 UTC
        



There are a bunch of bugs similar to this that are being duped as bug 239441, but I question whether this is the same issue. This bug report shows that etta_sort_info_changed() is called with a NULL pointer for the sort_info parameter, whereas bug 239441 does not have a NULL pointer, so might be a slightly different failure case.  Somebody more familiar with the code might be able to tell for sure whether they're duplicates.






Comment 2


palfrey





          2007-01-02 18:44:24 UTC
        



*** Bug 391639 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 3


palfrey





          2007-01-02 18:44:37 UTC
        



*** Bug 388138 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 4


palfrey





          2007-01-02 18:44:45 UTC
        



*** Bug 388515 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 5


palfrey





          2007-01-02 18:44:51 UTC
        



*** Bug 388569 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 6


palfrey





          2007-01-02 18:44:59 UTC
        



*** Bug 390779 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 7


palfrey





          2007-01-17 17:00:55 UTC
        



*** Bug 397461 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 8


Susana





          2007-01-19 13:07:56 UTC
        



*** Bug 398233 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 9


palfrey





          2007-02-02 00:20:16 UTC
        



*** Bug 403372 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 10


palfrey





          2007-02-06 17:44:31 UTC
        



*** Bug 404857 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 11


André Klapper





          2007-02-11 02:48:28 UTC
        



*** Bug 406106 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 12


Susana





          2007-02-19 23:09:08 UTC
        



*** Bug 409776 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 13


Pedro Villavicencio





          2007-02-26 18:33:57 UTC
        



*** Bug 412341 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 14


André Klapper





          2007-02-28 14:53:19 UTC
        



*** Bug 412620 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 15


Susana





          2007-03-01 15:59:44 UTC
        



*** Bug 413202 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 16


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2007-03-02 03:58:12 UTC
        



*** Bug 413722 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 17


André Klapper





          2007-03-04 22:52:59 UTC
        



*** Bug 413815 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 18


Akhil Laddha





          2007-03-13 14:11:20 UTC
        



*** Bug 417751 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 19


André Klapper





          2007-03-17 19:55:32 UTC
        



*** Bug 417802 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 20


Akhil Laddha





          2007-03-27 03:30:43 UTC
        



*** Bug 422910 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 21


Akhil Laddha





          2007-04-18 13:29:13 UTC
        



*** Bug 430687 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 22


Lucky Wankhede





          2007-09-07 14:14:40 UTC
        



*** Bug 472288 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 23


Tobias Mueller





          2007-09-25 01:40:30 UTC
        



*** Bug 477958 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 24


Tobias Mueller





          2007-09-25 01:47:51 UTC
        



Marking as dup of bug 239441 which is FIXED according to bug 239441 comment #38, bug 239441 comment #45 and bug 239441 comment #46

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 239441 ***






Comment 25


Tobias Mueller





          2007-10-12 13:16:20 UTC
        



*** Bug 480798 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 26


Tobias Mueller





          2007-10-12 13:16:36 UTC
        



*** Bug 480808 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 27


Tobias Mueller





          2007-10-12 13:16:44 UTC
        



*** Bug 481282 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 28


Tobias Mueller





          2007-10-12 13:16:53 UTC
        



*** Bug 483161 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 29


Tobias Mueller





          2007-10-12 13:17:06 UTC
        



*** Bug 483316 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 30


Tobias Mueller





          2007-10-12 13:18:04 UTC
        



*** Bug 451650 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 31


Tobias Mueller





          2007-10-12 13:18:48 UTC
        



*** Bug 464438 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 32


Cosimo Cecchi





          2007-10-15 10:09:29 UTC
        



*** Bug 486729 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***