After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 379288 - crash in Open Folder: ejecutando vmware workst...
crash in Open Folder: ejecutando vmware workst...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 360330
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-11-25 22:05 UTC by salvarori
Modified: 2006-11-25 22:23 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description salvarori 2006-11-25 22:05:23 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
ejecutando vmware workstation 5 en otra ventana


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 217559040 vsize: 217559040 resident: 37928960 share: 20410368 rss: 37928960 rss_rlim: -1
CPU usage: start_time: 1164489938 rtime: 1523 utime: 1401 stime: 122 cutime:1 cstime: 11 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 47798529272368 (LWP 5286)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002b78f25e6eef in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0

Thread 1 (Thread 47798529272368 (LWP 5286))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 gtk_container_add
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #4 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
  • #5 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
  • #6 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #7 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_signal_emit
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #10 _gtk_action_emit_activate
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #13 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_signal_emit
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 gtk_widget_activate
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #16 gtk_menu_shell_activate_item
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 gtk_menu_shell_append
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 g_closure_invoke
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 g_signal_emit
    from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #23 gtk_widget_get_default_style
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 gtk_propagate_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #26 _gdk_events_init
    from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #27 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_main_context_check
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #29 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #30 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #31 POA_Nautilus_MetafileMonitor__init
  • #32 __libc_start_main
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #33 ??
  • #34 ??
  • #35 ??
  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0

Comment 1 Jens Granseuer 2006-11-25 22:23:46 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 360330 ***