Bug 378084 – crash in Movie Player:

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 378084 - crash in Movie Player:


Summary:	crash in Movie Player:


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 364037

Product:	totem
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.16.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	General Totem maintainer(s)
QA Contact:	General Totem maintainer(s)

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-11-22 11:20 UTC by poitier
Modified:	2006-11-22 18:23 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description poitier 2006-11-22 11:20:24 UTC

Version: 2.16.2

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 152838144 vsize: 0 resident: 152838144 share: 0 rss: 30597120 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1163916583 rtime: 0 utime: 87 stime: 0 cutime:76 cstime: 0 timeout: 11 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/totem'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225599312 (LWP 32638)]
[New Thread -1341523040 (LWP 32655)]
[New Thread -1328813152 (LWP 32653)]
[New Thread -1320420448 (LWP 32652)]
[New Thread -1310139488 (LWP 32651)]
[New Thread -1297646688 (LWP 32650)]
[New Thread -1288959072 (LWP 32649)]
[New Thread -1276101728 (LWP 32648)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 88475

Thread 5 (Thread -1310139488 (LWP 32651))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 ??
#5 ??
#6 ??
#7 ??
#8 ??
#9 ??

Comment 1 Jan Arne Petersen 2006-11-22 18:23:50 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 364037 ***