Bug 377773 – crash in Terminal: Uhm, nothing. I think th...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 377773 - crash in Terminal: Uhm, nothing. I think th...


Summary:	crash in Terminal: Uhm, nothing. I think th...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 353498

Product:	gnome-terminal
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.16.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	GNOME Terminal Maintainers
QA Contact:	GNOME Terminal Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-11-21 14:02 UTC by ze4lot
Modified:	2006-11-21 17:24 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.17/2.18

Description ze4lot 2006-11-21 14:02:37 UTC

Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Uhm, nothing. I think this is a dup. I'll check as soon as i can =)


Distribution: Ubuntu 7.04 (feisty)
Gnome Release: 2.17.2 2006-11-14 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 65978368 vsize: 0 resident: 65978368 share: 0 rss: 14315520 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1164053209 rtime: 0 utime: 460 stime: 0 cutime:389 cstime: 0 timeout: 71 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 479

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226082624 (LWP 6087)]
[New Thread -1258620016 (LWP 6091)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 88252

Thread 1 (Thread -1226082624 (LWP 6087))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 libgnomeui_segv_handle
at gnome-ui-init.c line 874
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 gtk_widget_style_get_valist
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#5 gtk_widget_style_get
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#6 gtk_widget_style_get
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#7 gtk_widget_style_get
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#8 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#9 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#10 gtk_widget_style_get
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#11 gtk_widget_style_get
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 gtk_widget_queue_resize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 gtk_notebook_popup_enable
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#20 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#25 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#27 gtk_widget_reset_rc_styles
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#28 gtk_rc_get_theme_dir
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#29 gtk_icon_info_get_type
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#30 g_idle_dispatch
at gmain.c line 3926
#31 IA__g_main_context_dispatch
at gmain.c line 2045
#32 g_main_context_iterate
at gmain.c line 2677
#33 IA__g_main_loop_run
at gmain.c line 2881
#34 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#35 ??
#36 ??
#37 _IO_stdin_used
#38 ??
#39 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Mariano Suárez-Alvarez 2006-11-21 17:24:22 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 353498 ***