After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 369838 - crash in Movie Player: estava abrindo um filme
crash in Movie Player: estava abrindo um filme
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 364037
Product: totem
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: General Totem maintainer(s)
General Totem maintainer(s)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-11-03 05:15 UTC by saulbritto
Modified: 2006-11-07 22:27 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description saulbritto 2006-11-03 05:15:30 UTC
Version: 2.16.2

What were you doing when the application crashed?
estava abrindo um filme



Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 170479616 vsize: 0 resident: 170479616 share: 0 rss: 37031936 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1162530851 rtime: 0 utime: 259 stime: 0 cutime:235 cstime: 0 timeout: 24 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/totem'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225427280 (LWP 6160)]
[New Thread -1353196640 (LWP 6176)]
[New Thread -1335874656 (LWP 6175)]
[New Thread -1327481952 (LWP 6174)]
[New Thread -1317200992 (LWP 6173)]
[New Thread -1304708192 (LWP 6172)]
[New Thread -1295942752 (LWP 6169)]
[New Thread -1279489120 (LWP 6168)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 5 (Thread -1317200992 (LWP 6173))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 ??
  • #5 ??
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
  • #10 ??
  • #11 ??
  • #12 ??
  • #13 ??
  • #14 ??
  • #15 ??
  • #16 ??
  • #17 ??
  • #18 ??
  • #19 ??
  • #20 ??
  • #21 ??
  • #22 ??
  • #23 ??
  • #24 ??
  • #25 ??

Comment 1 Jan Arne Petersen 2006-11-07 22:27:11 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 364037 ***