Bug 368689 – crash in XChat-GNOME IRC Chat: Changing preferences

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 368689 - crash in XChat-GNOME IRC Chat: Changing preferences


Summary:	crash in XChat-GNOME IRC Chat: Changing preferences


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 356624

Product:	xchat-gnome
Classification:	Other
Component:	general
Version:	0.13
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	xchat-gnome maintainers
QA Contact:	xchat-gnome maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-11-01 03:40 UTC by petruchio
Modified:	2006-11-01 10:19 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description petruchio 2006-11-01 03:40:26 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Changing preferences


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 78823424 vsize: 0 resident: 78823424 share: 0 rss: 19111936 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1162352218 rtime: 0 utime: 1360 stime: 0 cutime:1270 cstime: 0 timeout: 90 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 2

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/xchat-gnome'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226516816 (LWP 13383)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 81286

Thread 1 (Thread -1226516816 (LWP 13383))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 strlen
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#5 g_strdup
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#6 gtk_button_set_label
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#7 set_nickname
#8 navigation_tree_create_new_channel_entry
#9 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#14 _gtk_tree_selection_internal_select_node
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 gtk_tree_view_scroll_to_cell
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 _gtk_tree_view_column_autosize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 g_value_set_boxed
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#23 gtk_widget_get_default_style
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 gtk_propagate_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#25 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 _gdk_events_init
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#27 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#28 g_main_context_check
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#29 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#30 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#31 fe_main
#32 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 David Trowbridge 2006-11-01 03:51:14 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 356524 ***

Comment 2 André Klapper 2006-11-01 10:18:37 UTC

not 356524, but 356624. :-)

Comment 3 André Klapper 2006-11-01 10:19:00 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 356624 ***