After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 368520 - crash in CD/DVD Creator: Installing Sun Java usin...
crash in CD/DVD Creator: Installing Sun Java usin...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 356672
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-10-31 20:14 UTC by bmorales
Modified: 2006-10-31 22:45 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description bmorales 2006-10-31 20:14:24 UTC 
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Installing Sun Java using apt-get	


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 136024064 vsize: 0 resident: 136024064 share: 0 rss: 39821312 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1162306064 rtime: 0 utime: 2940 stime: 0 cutime:2514 cstime: 0 timeout: 426 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 476

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1227168080 (LWP 5317)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 81145

Thread 1 (Thread -1227168080 (LWP 5317))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #5 raise
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #6 abort
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #7 g_logv
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_log
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_assert_warning
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
  • #11 gtk_tree_model_unref_node
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 gtk_tree_model_sort_convert_iter_to_child_iter
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 gtk_tree_model_unref_node
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 gtk_tree_model_iter_nth_child
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 gtk_tree_model_iter_nth_child
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #16 gtk_tree_row_reference_free
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 _gtk_tree_selection_row_is_selectable
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 _gtk_tree_selection_internal_select_node
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 gtk_tree_view_scroll_to_cell
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #20 gtk_tree_view_set_cursor_on_cell
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 gtk_tree_view_set_cursor
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
  • #23 g_source_is_destroyed
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #24 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #25 g_main_context_check
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #26 g_main_loop_run
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #27 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #28 POA_Nautilus_MetafileMonitor__init
  • #29 __libc_start_main
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #30 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 






Comment 1


Behdad Esfahbod





          2006-10-31 20:19:46 UTC
        



Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so. Thanks in advance!
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 367701 ***






Comment 2


Karsten Bräckelmann





          2006-10-31 22:45:20 UTC
        



Actually, it's the same as this issue...

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 356672 ***