After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 368379 - crash in Evolution: Trying to delete an atta...
crash in Evolution: Trying to delete an atta...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 357492
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.8.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-10-31 16:26 UTC by numpty
Modified: 2006-10-31 20:26 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description numpty 2006-10-31 16:26:20 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Trying to delete an attachment from an email I was composing


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 71913472 vsize: 0 resident: 210362368 share: 0 rss: 210362368 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 20852 rtime: 0 utime: 1162311274 stime: 0 cutime:7211 cstime: 0 timeout: 6850 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 361

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 805606480 (LWP 3151)]
[New Thread 873460976 (LWP 3577)]
[New Thread 859505904 (LWP 3558)]
[New Thread 858174704 (LWP 3187)]
[New Thread 849786096 (LWP 3161)]
[New Thread 839095536 (LWP 3159)]
[New Thread 830305520 (LWP 3157)]
[New Thread 821916912 (LWP 3155)]
0x0ea1f220 in waitpid () from /lib/libc.so.6

Thread 8 (Thread 821916912 (LWP 3155))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #3 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0

Thread 7 (Thread 830305520 (LWP 3157))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #3 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0

Thread 6 (Thread 839095536 (LWP 3159))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #3 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0

Thread 5 (Thread 849786096 (LWP 3161))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #3 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0

Thread 4 (Thread 858174704 (LWP 3187))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #3 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0

Comment 1 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-31 20:26:51 UTC
Unfortunately the stacktrace does not have any hints about the real cause of the crash and does not help in debugging this issue.

However, according to the description this is the same issue as bug 357492.


Just in case you can reproduce this crash later, please consider installing
debugging packages [1], which help a lot in tracking down the crash.  Thanks!

Also, please feel free to report any further bugs you find.  Thanks!


[1] debugging packages for evolution, evolution-data-server and gtkhtml,
    plus debugging packages for some basic GNOME libs. More details can
    be found here:
    http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces/DistroSpecificInstructions


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 357492 ***