Bug 367863 – crash in Evolution: deleting attached image ...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 367863 - crash in Evolution: deleting attached image ...


Summary:	crash in Evolution: deleting attached image ...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 357492

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	general
Version:	2.8.x (obsolete)
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Duplicates:	410429 428344 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-10-30 19:33 UTC by mateusz_holysz
Modified:	2007-04-11 16:18 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description mateusz_holysz 2006-10-30 19:33:11 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
deleting attached image from attachment Bar with "delete" keyboard button


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 241975296 vsize: 0 resident: 241975296 share: 0 rss: 34668544 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1162236661 rtime: 0 utime: 1234 stime: 0 cutime:1160 cstime: 0 timeout: 74 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1232697680 (LWP 6169)]
[New Thread -1372796000 (LWP 6197)]
[New Thread -1364403296 (LWP 6195)]
[New Thread -1312334944 (LWP 6191)]
[New Thread -1295549536 (LWP 6190)]
[New Thread -1320805472 (LWP 6186)]
[New Thread -1303942240 (LWP 6185)]
[New Thread -1287156832 (LWP 6180)]
[New Thread -1278764128 (LWP 6179)]
[New Thread -1270371424 (LWP 6178)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 80611

Thread 1 (Thread -1232697680 (LWP 6169))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 waitpid
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 segv_redirect
at main.c line 426
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 e_attachment_bar_remove_selected
at e-attachment-bar.c line 478
#6 key_press_event
at e-msg-composer.c line 3757
#7 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#8 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 gtk_widget_get_default_style
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 gtk_window_propagate_key_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 gtk_window_activate_key
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 bonobo_window_remove_popup
from /usr/lib/libbonoboui-2.so.0
#16 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 g_value_set_boxed
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 gtk_widget_get_default_style
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 gtk_propagate_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#25 _gdk_events_init
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#27 g_main_context_check
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#28 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#29 bonobo_main
from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
#30 main
at main.c line 615
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-31 18:20:00 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 357492 ***

Comment 2 palfrey 2007-02-21 17:39:33 UTC

*** Bug 410429 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 3 palfrey 2007-04-11 16:18:42 UTC

*** Bug 428344 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***