Bug 364517 – crash in Open Folder: renaming a file

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 364517 - crash in Open Folder: renaming a file


Summary:	crash in Open Folder: renaming a file


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 356672

Product:	nautilus
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus Maintainers
QA Contact:	Nautilus Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-10-23 19:33 UTC by afermin
Modified:	2006-10-31 14:35 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description afermin 2006-10-23 19:33:49 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
renaming a file


Distribution: Fedora Core release 5.92 (FC6 Test3)
Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 478048256 vsize: 478048256 resident: 42934272 share: 19009536 rss: 42934272 rss_rlim: -1
CPU usage: start_time: 1161619656 rtime: 5027 utime: 4505 stime: 522 cutime:0 cstime: 3 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 46912496393680 (LWP 4972)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x0000003678e0d96f in waitpid () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

+ Trace 77908

Thread 1 (Thread 46912496393680 (LWP 4972))

#0 waitpid
from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#1 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#2 <signal handler called>
#3 raise
from /lib64/libc.so.6
#4 abort
from /lib64/libc.so.6
#5 g_logv
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#6 g_log
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#7 g_assert_warning
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
#9 gtk_tree_model_sort_convert_iter_to_child_iter
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#10 gtk_tree_model_iter_nth_child
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#11 gtk_tree_model_iter_nth_child
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 gtk_tree_model_iter_nth_child
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 gtk_tree_row_reference_free
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 gtk_tree_model_sort_new_with_model
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 gtk_tree_selection_select_range
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 gtk_tree_view_scroll_to_cell
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 gtk_tree_view_set_cursor_on_cell
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
#19 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#20 g_main_context_check
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#21 g_main_loop_run
from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#22 gtk_main
from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 POA_Nautilus_MetafileMonitor__init
#24 __libc_start_main
from /lib64/libc.so.6
#25 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__ENUM
#26 ??
#27 ??
#0 waitpid
from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

Comment 1 jamie 2006-10-31 12:35:57 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This bug report isn't very useful because it doesn't describe the bug well. If you have time and can still reproduce the bug, please read http://bugzilla.gnome.org/bug-HOWTO.html and add a more useful description to this bug.

Comment 2 André Klapper 2006-10-31 14:35:53 UTC

afermin: Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

Jamie: A good description does not matter *that* much, it's more important to check first if the stacktrace is a duplicate. The stacktrace is nearly the same as bug 356672 (okay - the unref fgnction call is missing, anyway), therefore marking as duplicate.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 356672 ***