Bug 364515 – crash in Open Folder: subir de carpeta

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 364515 - crash in Open Folder: subir de carpeta


Summary:	crash in Open Folder: subir de carpeta


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 356672

Product:	nautilus
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus Maintainers
QA Contact:	Nautilus Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-10-23 19:32 UTC by chevi1969
Modified:	2006-10-23 19:42 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description chevi1969 2006-10-23 19:32:55 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
subir de carpeta


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 343191552 vsize: 0 resident: 343191552 share: 0 rss: 70033408 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1161628737 rtime: 0 utime: 15605 stime: 0 cutime:13591 cstime: 0 timeout: 2014 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 3340

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226942800 (LWP 4489)]
[New Thread -1469776992 (LWP 8244)]
[New Thread -1461384288 (LWP 8243)]
[New Thread -1452991584 (LWP 8242)]
[New Thread -1423574112 (LWP 8241)]
[New Thread -1406788704 (LWP 8240)]
[New Thread -1385849952 (LWP 8239)]
[New Thread -1377457248 (LWP 8217)]
[New Thread -1369064544 (LWP 8216)]
[New Thread -1398396000 (LWP 8215)]
[New Thread -1431966816 (LWP 8214)]
[New Thread -1440359520 (LWP 8213)]
[New Thread -1415181408 (LWP 8212)]
[New Thread -1356432480 (LWP 7900)]
[New Thread -1332122720 (LWP 7899)]
[New Thread -1321841760 (LWP 7898)]
[New Thread -1348019296 (LWP 7897)]
[New Thread -1302471776 (LWP 7896)]
[New Thread -1272091744 (LWP 7895)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 77906

Thread 1 (Thread -1226942800 (LWP 4489))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 __kernel_vsyscall
#5 raise
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#6 abort
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#7 g_logv
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8 g_log
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#9 g_assert_warning
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#10 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
#11 gtk_tree_model_unref_node
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 gtk_tree_model_sort_convert_iter_to_child_iter
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 gtk_tree_model_unref_node
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 gtk_tree_model_iter_nth_child
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 gtk_tree_model_iter_nth_child
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 gtk_tree_row_reference_free
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 _gtk_tree_selection_row_is_selectable
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 _gtk_tree_selection_internal_select_node
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 gtk_tree_view_scroll_to_cell
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#20 gtk_tree_view_set_cursor_on_cell
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 gtk_tree_view_set_cursor
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
#23 g_source_is_destroyed
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#24 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#25 g_main_context_check
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#26 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#27 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#28 POA_Nautilus_MetafileMonitor__init
#29 __libc_start_main
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#30 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-23 19:42:23 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 356672 ***