After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 364076 - crash in Movie Player: Loading a WMV file
crash in Movie Player: Loading a WMV file
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 360324
Product: totem
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: General Totem maintainer(s)
General Totem maintainer(s)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-10-22 03:13 UTC by tbarrie
Modified: 2006-10-22 04:36 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description tbarrie 2006-10-22 03:13:07 UTC
Version: 2.16.2

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Loading a WMV file


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 129245184 vsize: 0 resident: 129245184 share: 0 rss: 31133696 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1161486756 rtime: 0 utime: 234 stime: 0 cutime:208 cstime: 0 timeout: 26 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/totem'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225238864 (LWP 7886)]
[New Thread -1323627616 (LWP 7897)]
[New Thread -1306485856 (LWP 7896)]
[New Thread -1298093152 (LWP 7895)]
[New Thread -1287812192 (LWP 7894)]
[New Thread -1275319392 (LWP 7893)]
[New Thread -1266656352 (LWP 7892)]
[New Thread -1258226784 (LWP 7889)]
[New Thread -1241863264 (LWP 7888)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 5 (Thread -1287812192 (LWP 7894))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 ??
  • #5 ??
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??

Comment 1 André Klapper 2006-10-22 04:36:43 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 360324 ***