Bug 363997 – crash in Camorama Webcam Viewer: Turning on the Laplace e...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 363997 - crash in Camorama Webcam Viewer: Turning on the Laplace e...


Summary:	crash in Camorama Webcam Viewer: Turning on the Laplace e...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 154867

Product:	camorama
Classification:	Deprecated
Component:	User Interface
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Camorama Maintainers
QA Contact:	Camorama Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-10-21 19:11 UTC by molgar
Modified:	2006-10-21 20:01 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description molgar 2006-10-21 19:11:06 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Turning on the Laplace effect


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 43474944 vsize: 0 resident: 43474944 share: 0 rss: 17264640 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1161457788 rtime: 0 utime: 154 stime: 0 cutime:131 cstime: 0 timeout: 23 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/camorama'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225541248 (LWP 26999)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 77550

Thread 1 (Thread -1225541248 (LWP 26999))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 ??
#5 ??
#6 ??
#7 ??
#8 ??
#9 ??
#10 ??
#11 ??
#12 ??
#13 ??
#14 ??
#15 ??
#16 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 André Klapper 2006-10-21 20:01:20 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

This issue has been already fixed.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 154867 ***