Bug 362070 – crash in System Monitor: Came back to the machine...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 362070 - crash in System Monitor: Came back to the machine...


Summary:	crash in System Monitor: Came back to the machine...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 352444

Product:	system-monitor
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.16.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	System-monitor maintainers
QA Contact:	System-monitor maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-10-14 02:24 UTC by cwillu
Modified:	2011-11-11 10:03 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description cwillu 2006-10-14 02:24:58 UTC

Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Came back to the machine after several hours (I've disabled the screensaver and powersaving though), started some music, switched workspaces and clicked the gnome menu.  


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 250445824 vsize: 0 resident: 250445824 share: 0 rss: 199151616 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1160730658 rtime: 0 utime: 816646 stime: 0 cutime:601360 cstime: 0 timeout: 215286 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-system-monitor'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225361744 (LWP 11339)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 76234

Thread 1 (Thread -1225361744 (LWP 11339))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 __kernel_vsyscall
#5 raise
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#6 abort
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#7 g_logv
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8 g_log
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#9 g_assert_warning
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#10 ORBit_RootObject_duplicate_T
from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
#11 CORBA_free
from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
#12 CORBA_free
from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
#13 ORBit_free_T
from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
#14 ORBit_free
from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
#15 CORBA_free
from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
#16 gnome_accessibility_module_shutdown
from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libatk-bridge.so
#17 gnome_accessibility_module_shutdown
from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libatk-bridge.so
#18 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 atk_object_notify_state_change
from /usr/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0
#22 gail_window_new
from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgail.so
#23 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#25 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#26 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#27 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#28 gtk_widget_get_default_style
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#29 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#30 _gdk_events_init
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#31 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#32 g_main_context_check
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#33 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#34 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#35 ??
#36 ??
#37 _IO_stdin_used
#38 ??
#39 ??
#40 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Elijah Newren 2006-10-14 02:49:29 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

Matches the stack trace in bug 361056, which has been marked as a duplicate of 352444

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 352444 ***

Comment 2 bill.haneman 2006-10-16 21:37:47 UTC

Stack trace doesn't make any sense.  Why is gnome_accessibility_module_shutdown being called here?  Is the trace valid?

Or is something calling gnome_program_exit() without actually terminating?  (The latter is what I suspect - which would seem to me to be a serious error)