Bug 361970 – crash in Camorama Webcam Viewer: testé une webcam creativ...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 361970 - crash in Camorama Webcam Viewer: testé une webcam creativ...


Summary:	crash in Camorama Webcam Viewer: testé une webcam creativ...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 156333

Product:	camorama
Classification:	Deprecated
Component:	User Interface
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Camorama Maintainers
QA Contact:	Camorama Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-10-13 17:10 UTC by loicvds
Modified:	2006-10-13 17:14 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description loicvds 2006-10-13 17:10:53 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
testé une webcam creative pc-cam750 dans camorama... en choisissant mode "mirroir" 


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 42217472 vsize: 0 resident: 42217472 share: 0 rss: 13578240 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1160759347 rtime: 0 utime: 105 stime: 0 cutime:90 cstime: 0 timeout: 15 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/camorama'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225115264 (LWP 10741)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 76160

Thread 1 (Thread -1225115264 (LWP 10741))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 ??
#5 ??
#6 ??
#7 ??
#8 ??
#9 ??
#10 ??
#11 ??
#12 ??
#13 ??
#14 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-13 17:14:04 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 156333 ***