Bug 360772 – crash in Networking: Opening System -> Admini...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 360772 - crash in Networking: Opening System -> Admini...


Summary:	crash in Networking: Opening System -> Admini...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 360435

Product:	gnome-system-tools
Classification:	Deprecated
Component:	network-admin
Version:	2.15.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Carlos Garnacho
QA Contact:	Carlos Garnacho

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-10-08 22:26 UTC by randy.noel
Modified:	2006-10-08 23:17 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description randy.noel 2006-10-08 22:26:01 UTC

Version: 2.15.5

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Opening System -> Administration -> Networking		


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 31993856 vsize: 0 resident: 31993856 share: 0 rss: 8531968 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1160346292 rtime: 0 utime: 8 stime: 0 cutime:7 cstime: 0 timeout: 1 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/network-admin'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225963248 (LWP 5192)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 75332

Thread 1 (Thread -1225963248 (LWP 5192))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 ??
from /usr/lib/liboobs-1.so.2
#5 ??
#6 ??
#7 ??
#8 ??
#9 ??
#10 ??
#11 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Elijah Newren 2006-10-08 23:17:50 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 360435 ***