After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 360482 - crash in Networking: right clicked on the net...
crash in Networking: right clicked on the net...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 360435
Product: gnome-system-tools
Classification: Deprecated
Component: network-admin
2.15.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Carlos Garnacho
Carlos Garnacho
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-10-07 19:59 UTC by yayogak
Modified: 2006-10-07 20:09 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description yayogak 2006-10-07 19:59:36 UTC
Version: 2.15.5

What were you doing when the application crashed?
right clicked on the network icon on the panel>then clicked on properties and then the configure button in the "connection properties eth1 window"


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 31977472 vsize: 0 resident: 31977472 share: 0 rss: 8515584 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1160251064 rtime: 0 utime: 39 stime: 0 cutime:35 cstime: 0 timeout: 4 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/network-admin'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225926384 (LWP 5449)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1225926384 (LWP 5449))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 ??
    from /usr/lib/liboobs-1.so.2
  • #5 ??
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
  • #10 ??
  • #11 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Elijah Newren 2006-10-07 20:09:07 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 360435 ***