Bug 358959 – crash in Terminal: browsing icon themes

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 358959 - crash in Terminal: browsing icon themes


Summary:	crash in Terminal: browsing icon themes


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 353498

Product:	gnome-terminal
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.16.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	GNOME Terminal Maintainers
QA Contact:	GNOME Terminal Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-10-02 10:34 UTC by jay
Modified:	2006-10-02 12:07 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description jay 2006-10-02 10:34:23 UTC

Version: 2.16.0

What were you doing when the application crashed?
browsing icon themes


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 51232768 vsize: 0 resident: 51232768 share: 0 rss: 12673024 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1159783659 rtime: 0 utime: 242 stime: 0 cutime:230 cstime: 0 timeout: 12 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 469

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226529104 (LWP 5388)]
[New Thread -1247835232 (LWP 5561)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 74036

Thread 1 (Thread -1226529104 (LWP 5388))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 gtk_widget_style_get_valist
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#5 gtk_widget_style_get
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#6 gtk_widget_style_get
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#7 gtk_widget_style_get
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#8 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#9 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#10 gtk_widget_style_get
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#11 gtk_widget_style_get
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 gtk_widget_queue_resize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 gtk_notebook_popup_enable
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#20 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#25 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#27 gtk_widget_reset_rc_styles
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#28 gtk_rc_get_theme_dir
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#29 gtk_icon_info_get_type
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#30 g_source_is_destroyed
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#31 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#32 g_main_context_check
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#33 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#34 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#35 ??
#36 ??
#37 _IO_stdin_used
#38 ??
#39 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-02 12:07:39 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

Also, the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 353498 ***