Bug 358407 – crash in Evolution:

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 358407 - crash in Evolution:


Summary:	crash in Evolution:


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 356510

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	general
Version:	2.8.x (obsolete)
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Harish Krishnaswamy
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-09-30 01:37 UTC by Marcel Holtmann
Modified:	2006-09-30 04:17 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description Marcel Holtmann 2006-09-30 01:37:20 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 478658560 vsize: 478658560 resident: 153649152 share: 26288128 rss: 153649152 rss_rlim: -1
CPU usage: start_time: 1159563806 rtime: 14583 utime: 12784 stime: 1799 cutime:1186 cstime: 90 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 47254557327200 (LWP 29673)]
[New Thread 1124362576 (LWP 18972)]
[New Thread 1124096336 (LWP 18970)]
[New Thread 1115703632 (LWP 29682)]
[New Thread 1107310928 (LWP 29680)]
[New Thread 1098918224 (LWP 29679)]
[New Thread 1090525520 (LWP 29677)]
[New Thread 1082132816 (LWP 29676)]
0x00002afa4ace46df in __libc_waitpid () from /lib/libc.so.6

+ Trace 73636

Thread 8 (Thread 1082132816 (LWP 29676))

#0 __select_nocancel
from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 e_msgport_wait
at e-msgport.c line 643
#2 thread_dispatch
at e-msgport.c line 1035
#3 start_thread
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#4 ??

Thread 7 (Thread 1090525520 (LWP 29677))

#0 __select_nocancel
from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 e_msgport_wait
at e-msgport.c line 643
#2 thread_dispatch
at e-msgport.c line 1035
#3 start_thread
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#4 ??

Thread 6 (Thread 1098918224 (LWP 29679))

#0 __select_nocancel
from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 e_msgport_wait
at e-msgport.c line 643
#2 thread_dispatch
at e-msgport.c line 1035
#3 start_thread
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#4 ??

Thread 5 (Thread 1107310928 (LWP 29680))

#0 __select_nocancel
from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 e_msgport_wait
at e-msgport.c line 643
#2 thread_dispatch
at e-msgport.c line 1035
#3 start_thread
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#4 ??

Thread 4 (Thread 1115703632 (LWP 29682))

#0 __select_nocancel
from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 e_msgport_wait
at e-msgport.c line 643
#2 sync_op
at em-sync-stream.c line 229
#3 stream_close
at em-sync-stream.c line 327
#4 camel_object_unref
at camel-object.c line 928
#5 efh_format_do
at em-format-html.c line 1257
#6 mail_msg_received
at mail-mt.c line 570
#7 thread_dispatch
at e-msgport.c line 987
#8 start_thread
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#9 ??

Comment 1 Elijah Newren 2006-09-30 04:17:10 UTC

We still need the info you were previously asked for.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 356510 ***